Hyerdahl wrote:
>
> Good for her.  It should be shocking when men use the 'inferior
brain'
> response in order to exclude women from a societal institution or
> explain why they have not been included.  We've evolved past that.

When you can show me PROOF that women have the same spatial abilities
say in the realm of genius, then men will believe you. Until then,
feminists are basketcases.

> Women may well "cluster around the average" just like most men, but
if
> women were excluded from the same levels of math, it's hard to pass
> that on to ones daughters, eh?

This just proves how pathetic you hold women up to be, eh?

Genius has always trumped social choices, just ask the garage flight
brothers.


> > >
> Indeed.  His performance is piss poor.  He does not represent Harvard
> well, and because of his sexist statements should step down.   If you
> are a woman attending Harvard, you will know that your president
thinks
> less of your brain power, than that of your brother students.  How
can
> such a man continue to represent the women of Harvard.  Should he
slip
> them a sly grin as they walk by?

What don't feminists like about the truth in womens brains not showing
the same abilities?

>
> INdeed.  The women of Harvard should NOT accept the sly grins of
> Summers.  They should have a leader who also represents THEM.

There are numerous woman only services to carrot and stick apparently
equal women. ;-0)


> He has already come out of the sexist closet; what more can he say.
> The women teachers and students of Harvard should not have to accept
> him.  He doesn't represent them.  It's over, and the fat LADY is
> singing.  If he want to continue his sexism he can, or he can say he
> was wrong, but either way, women of Harvard should not have to deal
> with his sly smile as they pass.

Women alone can't even work the roads, let alone work out a new
Operating System.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:45 PM ---