| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: 2 USD 4 1 UKL |
From: John Beckett "Geo." wrote in message news:: > it's just that CO2 itselfs has some capacity to absorb/reflect sunlight > so for that to make a difference you need a significant amount in > comparison to the total atmosphere since you are talking about > atmosphereic change. Negative on that batman. The CO2 does its stuff regardless of the rest of the atmosphere (except that apparently there is some nonlinear interaction between the various greenhouse-effect gases). You could remove all the nitrogen and oxygen from the atmosphere and have no effect on the greenhouse effect of CO2 (I think). The proportion of CO2 is simply not relevant. The issue merely concerns the probability of whether a photon of infrared radiation escaping from earth would be captured by hitting a CO2 molecule. That probability is determined by how many CO2 molecules there are per square meter of earth. The fact that there is a huge quantity of nitrogen and oxygen merely allows the photon to travel a long way vertically before either hitting a CO2 molecule, or continuing to space. John --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.