| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: 2 USD 4 1 UKL |
From: "Mark"
John, I thought it was you that has continually said that none of us
(including you) are qualified to comment on global warming, yet suddenly a
miniscule increase in CO2 (I mean like, wow, from 200 something to 300
something parts per **million**) is suddenly cause for you to drop your
claim of not being well enough versed in the subject and take a strong
position of doom?
"John Beckett" wrote in message
news:sdrl23lca1v9s717474g1u9frb0q7s8d3p{at}4ax.com...
> "Geo." wrote in message
news::
>> My point is 1.35 x nothing is still nothing.
>
> The reason that a tiny proportion of CO2 is important is:
> - The PROPORTION is not relevant.
> - It is the TOTAL that matters.
>
> You can argue:
> - It's the volcanoes.
> - It's the forest burning.
> - If we don't do it, China will.
> - I can't hear you LALALALA.
>
> But it is absurd to say that 3E12 tons of CO2 doesn't matter, or that a
> 35% increase in CO2 is unimportant.
>
> John
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.