Dustbin wrote:
> Aggy wrote:
>
>> "Dustbin"  wrote
in message
>> news:MHMZd.69305$y25.67130{at}fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>> Aggy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Dustbin"
 wrote in message
>>>> news:AaJZd.60372$ug2.8992{at}fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Aggy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dustbin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear, if these men are working then their wages
would be docked.
>>>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> father is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> as responsible for the child as the mother and I
think it's low
>>>>>> for you
>>>>
>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> take it out on the children like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aggy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You people always want the responsibility to be
>>>>> one way around.
>>>>
>>>> Us people?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I don't hear females demanding that something be
>>>>> done about the antisocial behaviour of wimmin.
>>>>
>>>> You can't hear all the women, dear.
>>>>
>>>> Aggy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, the ones that may be condemning the
>>> antisocial behaviour of wimmin are hard to hear.
>>> It's the sisters that get all the attention -
>>> there's no shortage of them.
>>>
>>
>> Have you met every woman in the world, dear?
>
> That's a stupid jibe.
yes you're right dear. I should have said, "Have you met every female in the
world, dear?"
>That is like hymendung
> demanding proof on usenet.
You cant say and mean, "Well, the ones that may be condemning the antisocial
behaviour of wimmin are hard to hear." without listening for them dear.
>It can't be done so
> demand the impossible as evidence and then
> condemn the opponent as having failed to meet
> your standard of evidence.
I agree dear, so it would be prudent not to make a comment that has to be
proved to believed. No dear, I'm not into censorship but I am into sensible.

Aggy





--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:41 PM ---