Philip Lewis wrote:
> "Aggy"  wrote in message
>> Now, now dear. It's not for you to explain my own statements to me. I
>> understand them better than you do.
>
> I'm not at all impressed
I'm not here to impress you, dear.
> with the evidence so far of your alleged
> 'understanding'
I have not offered any evidence, dear.
>>> It
>>> was you that made the totally illogical leap that feminist
>>> resistance was the affair of 'male only armies'.
>> No I didn't, dear!
>
> Yes you did.
No I didn't, dear!
>> I'm quite intrigued you thought I was here for your entertainment,
>> dear. Yes, dear they should definitely piece a smiley for sarcasm.
>
> It wouldn't help
You're right, dear. You still wouldn't understand it.
>>> Your own words follow:-
>>> "does this mean all the wars over the world will end as these
>>> so called "male only" armies will reunite in their hatred of
>>> feminism?"
>> Pay attention dear. Note the question mark.
>
> Since you have admitted that you were being sarcastic
You finally accept that, dear! Tripped yourself up there didn't you dear.
>
> Phil
*snip Phil's involuntary admission, he is out of his depth*

Aggy





--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:39 PM ---