Gordon Lewicky wrote to Robert Bashe on Sunday June 06 2004 at 20:20:

 RB>> I don't think that was ever in doubt, Gordon. The critical point,
 RB>> however, is whether Ward actually organized a ZCC _vote_ to
 RB>> remove Bob Satti as IC. I mean a formal vote, like this time, not
 RB>> merely that Bob was put under pressure to resign.

 GL> Like I said, some will beleive what they want to believe and not
 GL> what actually happened. Ward did organize a vote against Bob Satti!

Gordon, I'm not talking about a "vote against Bob Satti" in the
sense that Ward worked to gain support for himself as IC. Some people are
muddying the waters, for whatever reasons.

I'm talking about one thing, and one thing only: an official, formal ZCC
vote to REMOVE Bob Satti from office.

Nobody has yet claimed THAT happened. There is no doubt that Ward worked to
replace Bob, also no doubt that Ward was elected IC by a vote of the ZCC,
but that is NOT the point here.

A ZCC vote to REMOVE Bob Satti from office _against his will_ would be a
fact, not an opinion, and would be easy to date and verify. The fact that
nobody has done this up to now, and that all the "answers" I
receive avoid answering that very specific question with a simple yes or
no, stating the date of the removal vote, tells me that the question itself
is embarrassing.

I ask a direct, very specific question and get bluster. What would you
think under such circumstances?

GL> Hey, you're fond of screaming representation. Let's see, Ward was
GL> elected Z2C on 26 Jun, 2000 with 13 votes out of 31 regions. Fidonews,
GL> Volume 17, Number 27, 03 Jul 2000. Interesting...

Does that have anything to do with the answer to my question?

Cheers, Bob

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-0613