Hi Charles, as you were just saying about Censorship....
CH> TR>supply. I would maintain that the people should have the right of self
CH>   >preservation. Take that same sign about how to poison 
CH>   >the water and put it o
CH>   >public property by a major water supply. Would we or 
CH>   >should we have to leave
CH>   >it there because of free speech issues? I don't think so. If you can
CH>   >logically answer this question, "no", many other circumstances would 
e
CH>   >answered in the same manner. Just food for thought and discussion.
CH> 
CH> Placing the sign on a public water supply certainly complicates 
CH> resolution of the issue.  Obviously, merely creating such a sign
CH> is one thing, while placing it on a public water supply is quite
CH> another.   
And that would be the separation.  Creating the sign would be freedom
of speech, placing that information at the water supply for use
against that specific target could be conspiracy to commit a crime. 
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X Some days you eat the bear........some days the bear eats 
you...
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------