| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re-reexamining Torture .. |
-> DD> "What's he punishing you for? You punish somebody," Scalia says. -> Amazing. Cops get to kick the living shit out of you because you -> haven't been found giulty of anything. That would be police brutality, which as most people know is illegal. It would not fit the definition of punishment as used in the Constitution. Scalia explained that in the interview. You should have read it, if you could have stopped your knee from jerking for a minute. You could also read, for example: http://atheistethicist.blogspot.com/2008/05/scalia-torture-and-responsib ilities-of.html A few selections for you to fail to read: "Scalia is right. For something to count as punishment it has to be a penalty inflicted by law for the commission of a crime." "The moral issue that I have with this is that those who wrote gotcha articles against Scalia on this issue should have known the truth about what he said." "Those who knew but who did not care have shown that they are the type of people who are comfortable with bearing false witness against others for the purpose of promoting (unjustified) hostility against them. We do not need these types of people in this culture. We are much better served by people who care about the truth." "Those who did not know what Scalia actually meant were intellectually reckless. They were still people motivated by a desire to hate and, as a result of that motivation, blinded themselves to relevant facts that a concerned and responsible person would have seen." "We can extend this sphere of moral culpability outward to include the audience for these writers. This type of writing exists to the degree that there is an audience for it a group of readers whose attitude is, "Do not tell me the truth. Tell me what I want to hear."" This, by the way, is from a blogger who dislikes Scalia, dislikes Scalia's politics, and expressed a dislike of being put in the position of saying that, in this instance, Scalia is right. His comments make it look like he anticipated exactly what you and Drummond have been saying in this thread! --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10* Origin: (1:226/600) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 11/331 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 187 140/1 226/0 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 396/45 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 5030/1256 @PATH: 226/600 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.