On 11/09/2020 14:36, Mayayana wrote:
> "Martin Gregorie"  wrote
>
> | >   Did "consumers" choose these things?
> | >
> | Yes, they did!
> |
> | If they hadn't chosen to buy them, the business pushing them would have
> | gone bust and their shitty products would no longer exist.
> |
>
>      You missed my point entirely. I'm guessing there
> are aspects of your life where you've been duped due
> to ignorance. It's not realistic to think that everyone
> should be expert on everything. That's why marketing
> works. It doesn't excuse scammers. (Don't worry. I won't
> tell anyone you paid $200 for your Lululemon glorified
> pantyhose. :)
>
>
Marketing is not as all encompassing as its made out to be and those who
are susceptible will always be susceptible.
You cant fix lazy and stupid  and vain. 'Useful idiots' are born every
minute, and there is nothing to be done. They will always be gulled  by
everybody.

You are an excellent example.  You argue for state oversight but you
haven't thought it through. The state can be bought and in fact it is.
You really don't want to know who owns the Democrat party.

They *are* the people they warned you about...


--
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the
gospel of envy.

Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05