| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2 |
"Bill Garber" wrote in message
news:k9ydnegBBO5h7yrVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d{at}comcast.com...
>Accelerators are not trivial. Btw, ZipChip is not the only one for the IIe,
>and also, the earlier one for II+ works in them. I've run IIe with 3-4
>different ones.
Accelerators for the //e are impossible to find. I realize that they are not
trivial. What is to prevent you or Henry from reverse-engineering an Apple
//e zip chip and doing a production run?
Unless someone does this, I will never get one. Henry has one that he needs
for future testing.
What do you think it would cost if you had a run of 100 or so and took
pre-orders?
>Oh yeah. Now you need to get a CFFA, as well.
I don't think I need one. This Microdrive seems to work excellently. Why do
you think I need a CFFA? When I get my GS I will be buying a Microdrive as
well unless someone gives me a compelling reason not to or indicates why I
should buy a CFFA instead.
- Buggles
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: Derby City Gateway (1:2320/100.2008)SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 106/1 120/228 123/500 140/1 222/2 226/0 236/150 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1404 1406 1410 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 393/11 396/45 633/260 267 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 SEEN-BY: 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 2320/100 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.