-=> Quoting Dan Ceppa to Nancy Backus on 23 Oct 09  05:20:29 <=-

 NB>> I don't remember... :)   Just that you didn't have the Y2K issue
 NB>> because you were pointing, and using OMX...  You may have been lured
 NB>> into being active when people were needing help using some function or
 NB>> other of the reader's configuration... maybe even with tags or sigs?

 DC> I only recently got started using sigs!  If anything, it was about
 DC> taglines. 

It probably was to help someone get taglines working.  Or just something
more basic that someone was asking for help on...

 DC>> tagline files.  And taglines are why I moved from QWK to BW in the
 DC>> first  place.  
 NB>> 
 NB>> So you used Pollard's OMX to get your BW back...  :) 

 DC> Yep!  It's relatively straightfoward.  The one feature I don't have in
 DC> OMX is the ease of dfferent origin lines for each Echo.  I;ve yet to
 DC> find  a way to register OMX to unlock that.  

Now that's something that I don't have as a mere user... :) 
 
 NB>> ... I'm an amateur crastinator; some day I'll turn pro...

 DC> Based on the date of this, I ahead of you in your pursuit.  

Perhaps...  :)  Or you are just further behind than I, for a change. :) 

 DC> ... The sad thing about bashing Windows:  It's all true.

Sigh.  ;)

ttyl      neb

... WINDOWS, n. Microsoft's proof of PT Barnum's theory
--- Blue Wave/DOS v2.20