| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re-reexamining Tortur |
-> On 04 Jun 09 17:22:00, Bob Klahn got back to Dan Ceppa -> Re: Re-reexamining Tortur EC> illegal, and that it has been since 1898. Everyone knew EC> all along that you were making that up. There is no such EC> law. And it took you a long time and a series of EC> non-responses before you admitted it. BK> If there is no law how did the US get away with charging, BK> trying, and punishing people for it? That must have been the illegal part... BK> I agree. And those who, when confronted with the fact that the BK> US did consider waterboarding of US POWs by the Japanese in WW2, BK> would not try to divert to the subject of other forms of torture BK> the Japanese inflicted. What I find amazing is that they complain about liberal lawyer tricks yet they parse words tighter than Clinton did with the definition of "is". --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 11/331 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 187 140/1 226/0 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 396/45 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 5030/1256 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.