From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Jeff Shultz wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:51:18 +0000, Adam wrote:
>
>
>>Jeff Shultz wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:25:56 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060104-114052-6606r.htm
>>>>
>>>>"In his Dec. 16 letter, Mr. Tice wrote that his
testimony would be given
>>>>under the provisions of the 1998 Intelligence Community Whistleblower
>>>>Protection Act, which makes it legal for intelligence officials to
>>>>disclose wrongdoing without being punished."
>>>
>>>
>>>I predict that even so, he'll end up seeing a lot of bare concrete walls
>>>in his future.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>When the laws are unjust the place for the just man.....
>
>
> Nowhere in the whistleblower statutes does it say, "and if you don't get
> an answer you like, go blab to the NY Times..."
>
> He is not a just man.
>

So you say. I say that Washington & co should have been hung as
traitors. Once events reach the political level as this has then all sorts
of "laws & legality" becomes a fluid concept anyway which is
basically what this bod (& the administration) is saying anyway.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5