From: stumper 

Ray Fischer wrote:
> stumper   wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It is my position that
>>>>>>>>>> God is not something we can
understand so easily.
>>>>>>>>> And yet here you are, insisting that
you are qualified to describe
>>>>>>>>> the nature of God.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> God is not something
>>>>>>>> we just cannot understand anything about it, either.
>>>>>>> And yet here you are, insisting that oyur
definition of God is
>>>>>>> correct.  You say you understand the nature of
God and say you cannot
>>>>>>> understand anything about God.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I go by the words of people who insist that
>>>>>>>> they have had certain God experiences.
>>>>>>> You are an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have any reason not to trust them?
>>>>>>> Yes, idiot.
>>>>>> Do you believe in your government?
>>>>> Run away, moron.  Do like all the other morons do when
confronted with
>>>>> reality.
>>>> How do you know that your government even exists?
>>> How did you get to be such a stupid wanker?
>>>
>>>> Have you heard of the kingdom of God?
>>> Ah, of course, you found religion and decided that you didn't need a
>>> brain anymore.
>> If you don't need to prove that your government exists,
>
> Idiot.
>
>> God is our world government in exile.
>
> Sounds like you've got the beginning stages of schizophrenia.
>

I will go real slow specially for you. God is better handled in social
science than in natural science.
Didn't I say so about a week ago?
If you are still in doubt, ask your son.


My working hypothesis for this week is this: God is our world government in exile.

If you wanna know whether it even exists, you can use the same scientific
method you would use to establish that your government exists.

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag