Hola, Robert.
06 Jun 96, Robert Jung escribe a Carlos Fernandez Sanz:
 RJ> Due to the size of JAR and the machine requirements (very slow on
 RJ> older machines) as well as the difficulty of supporting various ARJ
 RJ> features, ARJ will still be supported.
    How old? We were talking about porting ARJ to OS/2. Since OS/2 machines 
are supposed to be reasonably fast, JAR should do, whatever its requirements.
    I think ARJ should not delay new proyects, but it is your decision :-)
    Anyway I have been using ARJ for years and it will always be a 
recommended download on my BBS. Not too much to pay ARJ's services to me 
but...
 RJ> It will use from 1/2 MB to 8MB or more of RAM for compression.  The
 RJ> more the merrier.  The JAR archive format is very complex.
    Just curious, can I ask the average compression rations of JAR vs ARJ?
Saludos.
cfs@emporium.subred.org
--- GoldED/2 2.50+
---------------