TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: bluewave
to: Sean Dennis
from: Dale Shipp
date: 2010-07-09 23:45:06
subject: BW vs. QWK

-=> On 07-09-10  07:49,  Sean Dennis <=-
 -=> spoke to Stephen Haffly about menus <=-

 SD> Anyhow, BW packets are better IMNSHO since they're more 
 SD> easily archivable (?) and dealt with than QWK packets.  

I'm curious as to why you say that.  I have been using Bluewave with QWK
packets for 15+ years, and have had no trouble at all with archival.  In
addition, I have collected a variety of routines that deal only with QWK
packets.  Although I have tried native BW packets in the past, I never
saw enough to make me want to give up the ability to use those programs.

                               Dale Shipp
                  fido_261_1466 (at) comcast (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 23:44:27, 09 Jul 2010
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)
SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848
@PATH: 261/1466 123/500 261/38 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.