| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM How Good Does a Diagonal Need to Be? |
To: atm{at}shore.net
From: Jim Burrows
Reply-To: Jim Burrows
At 07:25 2003-04-12 -0400, sd wrote:
>Using a transverse aberration model, basically straight from Texereau, with a
>few modifications, I arrived at the following expression, which the maximum
>depth of error on a diagonal,
>
> surface error = .86*lambda*minor axis/diameter of primary
Due to the messy wave (photon, quantum, etc.) nature of light, it doesn't
go where transverse aberration says it does. Here's a simpler, but truer
requirement for primary and diagonal surfaces:
sqrt(RMSpı + RMSdı/2) < 20 nm
with RMSp and RMSd the surface RMS of primary and diagonal. Dividing the
diagonal MS by 2 is for a 45 deg diagonal (I think).
Exercise for the reader: write down a formula for the requirement in terms
of SRp and SRd, where the SR are the Strehl ratios of the two surfaces.
Note: for a cass with straight-on secondary, the system Strehl ratio is
SRp*SRs, so how do we work the 45 deg diagonal in this case?
-- Jim Burrows
-- mailto://burrjaw{at}earthlink.net
-- http://home.earthlink.net/~burrjaw
-- Seattle N47.4723 W122.3662 (WGS84)
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.