From: "Robert G Lewis" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61AED.5F4470D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark if I had really wanted to play guilt by association I'd have =
mentioned David Duke , but I don't consider him to be anywhere
close = to the Mainstream of the Republicans. Robertson has been active in
the = Republican Party for years. Far more than Chavez who to my knowledge
is = not a registered democrat . of course remember the Republican
talk = about Michael Moore - Who is not a registered democrat and has never
= been active in the Democratic party. Talk about Guilt by Association =
.

Why do you have a problem with Politicians trying to get cheaper oil for =
their constituents ?=20
  "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:43cc68f3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  C'mon Bob, I have no doubt that Robertson supports Republican =
positions, that fact doesn't make those he supports responsible for =
anything he says. I'm sure that Chavez down Venezuela way supports Dem =
positions, but that doesn't mean they should answer for him (even if = some
feckless Dem politicians in MA are bargaining with him for cheap = oil).=20

  That's guilt by association with a real wide berth at that, same as =
the hapless, has-been, Sen. Kennedy was trying to equate to Alito with =
his lame recitation of a decades old article (that turned out to be =
satire at that) in a magazine that Alito never received, never read, and =
never contributed to.

    "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message =
news:43cc64f4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I have no reason to defend him. Reading the article that Gary posted =
I did not find it to as described as I stated.

    Robertson has had long standing ties and has supported the =
Republican Party. I have to think that he approves of a lot of the =
Republican positions.


    "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:43cc60c9{at}w3.nls.net...
      He's never won anything as far as I know (rightfully so) and I =
think the left's characterization of his influence on anyone at all is =
way overblown -- I've not heard anyone laud him in at least a decade for =
anything, rather they want to distance themselves from him (also =
rightfully so).

      Now, this Nagin video may be out of context (from the point of =
view of his whole speech), but I'll leave it to you to defend his =
"chocolate" comments, because I sure can't find any sympathy for
him:

       http://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61AED.5F4470D0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








Mark if I had really wanted to play guilt by =
association I'd=20
have mentioned David Duke <g>, but I don't consider him to be
= anywhere=20
close to the Mainstream of the Republicans. Robertson has been active in = the=20
Republican Party for years. Far more than Chavez who to my knowledge is = not a=20
registered democrat <g>. of course remember the Republican
talk = about=20
Michael Moore - Who is not a registered democrat and has never been = active in=20
the Democratic party. Talk about Guilt by Association =
<g>.
 
Why do you have a problem with Politicians
trying to =
get=20
cheaper oil for their constituents ? 

  "Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>=20">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com>=20
  wrote in message news:43cc68f3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  C'mon Bob, I have no doubt that =
Robertson=20
  supports Republican positions, that fact doesn't make those he =
supports=20
  responsible for anything he says. I'm sure that Chavez down Venezuela =
way=20
  supports Dem positions, but that doesn't mean they should answer for =
him (even=20
  if some feckless Dem politicians in MA are bargaining with him for=20
  cheap oil). 
   
  That's guilt by association with a =
real wide=20
  berth at that, same as the hapless, has-been, Sen. Kennedy was trying =
to=20
  equate to Alito with his lame recitation of a decades old article =
(that turned=20
  out to be satire at that) in a magazine that Alito never =
received,=20
  never read, and never contributed to.
   
  

    "Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
    message news:43cc64f4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I have no reason to defend him. Reading the =
article that=20
    Gary posted I did not find it to as described as I =
stated.
     
    Robertson has had long standing ties and has =
supported the=20
    Republican Party. I have to think that he approves of a lot of the=20
    Republican positions.
     
     
    "Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com>
wrote =
in message=20
    news:43cc60c9{at}w3.nls.net...
    

      He's never won anything
as far as =
I know=20
      (rightfully so) and I think the left's characterization of his =
influence=20
      on anyone at all is way overblown -- I've not heard anyone laud =
him in at=20
      least a decade for anything, rather they want to distance =
themselves from=20
      him (also rightfully so).
       
      Now, this Nagin video may be out =
of context=20
      (from the point of view of his whole speech), but I'll leave it to =
you to=20
      defend his "chocolate" comments, because I sure can't find any =
sympathy=20
      for him:
       
       htt=">http://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/">htt=
p://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/=
>
      
 

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61AED.5F4470D0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5