From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in message
news:43cf58e7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Robert G Lewis wrote:
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>> news:43cec992$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>>"Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote:
>>>If they were targeting one or 2 men then hitting 3 houses is to
>>>
>>>>knowingly kill innocent civies.
>>>
>>>Let's see these "innocent civies" are inviting Al
Qaeda over for dinner,
>>>hardly innocent.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope Just dead. Innocent or guilty would not apply. Remember this is not
>> a
>> legal matter . We don't want to run the war as law enforcement .
>>
>>
>>
> Even where said op happened in a friendly country?
>

If we keep this up I doubt they will remain friendly .The concept of
innocent  would imply ( to me) that this is a criminal matter. Since the
administration keeps saying we shouldn't be running the war as law
enforcement then they have no business implying the guilt of those we kill.

> I am curious as to wether it's now OK for the Indians to carry out
> similar strikes vs kashmiri terrorists/militants.
>
> Adam

Every bit as okay as our actions. I wonder if any Kashmiri live in New Jersey ?

At one time causing such destruction on a foreign country would have been
considered an act of war.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5