On 03 Jul 20  18:10:50, Alan Ianson said the following to Nick Andre:

AI> I don't find the gazette to be politically charged or baiting.

Janis just admitted to me it is and has admitted before on a few occasions. 
Maybe you don't see it as political because her beliefs match yours.

AI> I don't think I've ever said anything combative or insulting to you.

So perhaps its not a good idea to start, by:

AI> You told me my original response to you was an "illogical and loaded
AI> question". Did you consider that to be an insult? It was not meant to be
AI> insulting. It was a question.

Yours was a loaded question. Am I trying to censor the 'gazette. Clearly I'm
not, I just suggested a break from treating it like a soapbox. But you felt
the need to ask that as if I would be foolish enough to reply with "yes".

Then you clearly stated you replied in kind because you thought my original
post was illogical and loaded. So yes, its somewhat insulting to me when
someone clearly tries to play tired old douchebag semantics game with me.

I clearly explained to you using plain English in another echo that I question
everything and everyone. I receive two types of replies. Emotion-driven ones 
and logic-driven ones. And I clearly explained which ones I find engaging.

So either you be factual with me going forward and know that I do my homework
and research before I post something, or save the Oli-style childish retarded
antics... unless thats your gimmick and what yanks your crank in Fido.

End of thread.

Nick

--- Renegade vY2Ka2