From: "Pinch" 

On Mar 21, 12:32 pm, stumper  wrote:
> Pinch wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 5:18 pm, stumper  wrote:
> >> Pinch wrote:
> >>> On Mar 20, 10:39 am, stumper  wrote:
> >>>> Parsifal wrote:
> >>>>> On 20 mar, 06:12, "J Young"
 wrote:
> >>>>>> Roses are red
> >>>>>> Violets are blue
> >>>>>> The baby is dead
> >>>>>> Thanks to you
> >>>>> Roses are red
> >>>>> Violets are blue
> >>>>> Morons like you should be dead
> >>>>> Too bad your mother didn't get an abortion too
> >>>> Why so much hate?
> >>> I hate *IT* because it's a child-molesting little incubus from the
> >>> deepest part of hell. If you support the racist,
homphobic, murderous,
> >>> paedophilliac-lunatic mother fucker, expect the same
treatment as well.
> >> How do you know that much about him?
>
> > He's sickenly forward with his gruesome points, as exampled atop this
> > thread. Check it out -- it's pretty bad.
>
> >> Did he tell you all that?
>
> > Directly and indirectly.
>
> >> What other evidence do you have?
>
> > There's a plethora of his written shit in Google -- and under a score
> > of stolen and invented psuedonyms, too.
>
> > (LC and Parsifal have unearthed and reposted numerous evidential
> > examples of JYoung's unfathomable hatred and intolerance within this
> > thread and in others, should you wish to acknowledge as such.)
>
> >> Seen him convicted on the news?
>
> > Chances are pretty good.
>
> >> What if he is just mentally unstable?
>
> > That's a given.
>
> >> Worse yet, what if he is just saying things
> >> to play with your mind?
>
> > Psychopathic child-fuckers such as himself usually do.
>
> > As far my derision of him is concerned, it doesn't register with him;
> > however, it does serve as a supplemental warning to others in case
> > they think he's just nuts.
>
> > In truth, JYoung is truly an evil son of a whore-bitch. Truthfully.
>
> You might be correct.

JYoung presents himself exactly as I've previously described. Horrifyingly so.

> If I were you,

...which you can't be; because it'd require brain function which you've
demonstrably shown to lack.

> I would simply filter him out.

I'm not inclined to "filter" out (in  Google's case, manually
skip over) my adversaries' posts just because of my discomfort in reading
their written rubbish.

> Or simply ignore him.

It's simple, all I have to do is look over it. Iif myself and enough of the
readership ignores garbage posts like his, the posters for whom are
responsible for the posting the shit may be less inclined to post. But in
Jyoung's case, it doesn't matter; he'll continue to post his vile bile in
the newsgroups, hack into the systems of those whom he deems a threat and
destroy their systems and their reputations by posting with their
usernames, if he needs to, and stalk them, to boot.

> No need to waste your time reading him.

Reading Young is fairly easy. Reading his screeds is another, but it's a
risk  I'm willing to tackle. I've a responsibility to inform others about
his egregious online behavior.

> I you are worried about others,
> warn them about him once a week.

When his posts come available, I can.

> All you have to do is
> to read just one of his posts a week.

That's pretty much the average of posts, forged or original, he dumps into
the newsgroups weekly.

> If that is not enough,
> use just one word to comment on him.

All miscreants like yourself  only have one word suitable in which to
describe the whole lot of you; but there are varying degrees of "fuck-
up" which would require specificity.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag