From: "Rich Gauszka" 

Actually Summers made reference it 'innate differences'  in exploring why
there are so few women in math and science careers which set the activists
off.

With activists of any ilk there is a tendency is to shout down a view
instead of exploring it.

There are differences in the brains ( Hypothalamus, Corpus Callosum ... )
and the behavioral and neurological differences between the sexes do merit
further study.

I could say that even if there were the differences that Summers suggests,
that could be overcome by genetics and designer babies but that would set
another group off 


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:43e18fa1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Well, the Harvard thing was probably not the best example because it
> didn't really relate to the suppression of student thought/expression
> directly, but I found that incident to be entirely ridiculous. The
> president says, in a nutshell, that "boys and girls are different."
>
> Some chick claims to get almost physically sick over his lack of
> acknowledgement of the "equality" of women and men and next
thing you know
> he's groveling at her feet and funding a $50 million dollar program of
> some kind or another to appease her.
>
> Sorry, but I found that whole scenario insane.
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:43e18e3e{at}w3.nls.net...
>> That's what I was questioning on your  post mentioning Harvard. I'm
>> trying to figure out what campus actions ( there really are quite many )
>> that you find chilling.
>>
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:43e18d8c{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Oh, we probably have a misunderstanding Rich, my intent wasn't to find
>>> fault with your post, I was merely broadening the scope of the problem
>>> (in general) via the danger of what we're allowing to take place under
>>> our noses, and not only on campuses, but that it happens there is
>>> particularly chilling.
>>>
>>> Which reminds me that I should send some money to F.I.R.E. (
>>> http://www.thefire.org/ )
>>>
>>> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
>>> news:43e18ac5{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> My original reply just stated that the owner of the paper was an
>>>> Egyptian. In his case it's probably  a survival instinct kicking in.
>>>>
>>>> I will agree that what is offensive isn't necessarily
hatefull but when
>>>> one deals with fundies all bets on a civilized response
are off - ask
>>>> Rushdie. You can't ask Theo van Gogh as some fundie fanatic already
>>>> offed him.
>>>>
>>>> It will be interesting to see how the EU handalls the boycott
>>>>
>>>> 'EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson warned a Saudi
official during a
>>>> meeting in the Swiss ski resort of Davos that any boycott of Danish
>>>> products was tantamount to a boycott of European goods.'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>>>> news:43e1865c{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Sorry if I was fuzzy, but your reply seems to employ
circular logic
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>> "Rich Gauszka" 
wrote in message
>>>>> news:43e184de$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>> Can you be a bit less nebulous about your campus
rant? The problem
>>>>>> isn't in the desire to contain 'hate' speech but
in what some say
>>>>>> constitutes it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are talking about
>>>>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>>>>>> news:43e17fa8{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>I was serious Rich, all this "hate"
speech containment shit they've
>>>>>>>got going on, on our campuses is no different
than shutting down
>>>>>>>these cartoons, different people complaining,
but the same frigging
>>>>>>>sad sack ideology behind it, i.e.
"we" don't like it, "you" can't do
>>>>>>>it and sure enough everyone folds like a cheap suit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The president of Harvard, had he any balls,
should have fired that
>>>>>>> lame complaining chick that calls herself a
professor. >>>>>> speech containment appeasing union would have
had his head, but at
>>>>>>> least he'd still have his balls and the campus
could actually talk
>>>>>>> instead of cower to their inanity>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:43e17d18$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>> Just make sure your paper's owner isn't
from a Moslem controlled
>>>>>>>> country before you run the cartoons.
Sounds like the owner is in
>>>>>>>> CYA mode
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "The owner of France Soir, an
Egyptian, Raymond Lakah, said he
>>>>>>>> fired LeFranc to demonstrate "respect
for the intimate beliefs of
>>>>>>>> an individual" - apparently a
reference to religious beliefs."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Mark"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:43e171eb{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>> Apparently the owner of that paper
fired the editor that made the
>>>>>>>>> decision to run the cartoons and made
a groveling apology to
>>>>>>>>> anyone, anywhere that was at any time offended.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That said, it occurs to me that the
president of Harvard and
>>>>>>>>> students and faculty on campuses
across America have already given
>>>>>>>>> up with their misadventures into
"hate speech" tenets within their
>>>>>>>>> little fiefdoms.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We've already lost. Buy the prayer
mats or die. >>>>>>>> Alito can still save us, but it's doubtful>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:43e0c296{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/01/france.cartoon.ap/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PARIS, France (AP) -- A French
newspaper on Wednesday republished
>>>>>>>>>> caricatures of the Prophet
Muhammad that caused uproar in the
>>>>>>>>>> Muslim world when they were
printed in a Danish daily, saying
>>>>>>>>>> that religious dogma has no place
in a secular society.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The drawings, first printed
September 30 in Danish newspaper
>>>>>>>>>> Jyllands-Posten and reprinted in a
Norwegian magazine last month,
>>>>>>>>>> sparked boycotts and
demonstrations against Denmark throughout
>>>>>>>>>> the Muslim world.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Islamic tradition bars any
depiction of the prophet to prevent
>>>>>>>>>> idolatry.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The front page of the daily France
Soir on Wednesday carried the
>>>>>>>>>> headline "Yes, We Have the
Right to Caricature God" and a cartoon
>>>>>>>>>> of Buddhist, Jewish, Muslim and
Christian gods floating on a
>>>>>>>>>> cloud. Inside, the paper reran the drawings.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Germany's Welt daily also printed
one of the drawings on its
>>>>>>>>>> front page on Wednesday, arguing
that a "right to blasphemy" was
>>>>>>>>>> anchored in democratic freedoms.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "The appearance of the 12
drawings in the Danish press provoked
>>>>>>>>>> emotions in the Muslim world
because the representation of Allah
>>>>>>>>>> and his prophet is forbidden. But
because no religious dogma can
>>>>>>>>>> impose itself on a democratic and
secular society, France Soir is
>>>>>>>>>> publishing the incriminating
caricatures," France Soir said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5