| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Pentagon Study - Army stretched to breaking point |
From: "Rich Gauszka" I was glad to see that the higher rates of reenlistment bonuses for the Army were to those whose asses were on the line at least MOSs with the highest caps ( $40,000) http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/bonus/blarreenlistmentbonus4.htm ( infantry, special forces and counter intellgence ) MOS fields lookup http://usmilitary.about.com/od/enlistedjobs/a/arjobs.htm "Robert Comer" wrote in message news:43dc14b7{at}w3.nls.net... >I wasn't objecting to the pay, just the idea that it was to be competitive >with private industry. > > Lets face it, it's a "bribe" to keep putting their asses on the line and > I'm fine with that. > > -- > Bob Comer > > > "Rich Gauszka" wrote in message > news:43dbfa8b{at}w3.nls.net... >>I always remind myself that for those in the Army at least, their >>secondary MOS is rifleman and begrudge them not. >> >> >> "Robert Comer" wrote in message >> news:43dbf83c$1{at}w3.nls.net... >>>> You really don't understand what it is like and have no idea what is >>>> their base pay when you talk about competitive. >>> >>> Actually, I do, I'm the son of an Air Force guy who has lots of >>> relatives in other branches of the military, and you know what, they >>> *all* went into the military because it was the only way to get out of >>> the coal mines of West Virginia and to make a livable wage, so in their >>> case, not only was the pay competitive, it was better than private >>> industry. (as it is with a lot of people, probably most) >>> >>>>It is only used in rates that are >>>> very technical and have long schools. >>> >>> Kind of like my specialty you mean? (I was comparing my specialty and >>> work situation, so it's a given that I would be comparing myself to the >>> same in the military.) >>> >>> -- >>> Bob Comer >>> >>> >>> "George Sherwood" wrote in message >>> news:pan.2006.01.28.22.20.21.55161{at}beernabeer.com... >>>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:12:13 -0500, Robert Comer wrote: >>>> >>>>>> And how many 6 months deployments have you made over that 6 month >>>>>> period? >>>>> >>>>> 6 months worth, I'm on call 24x7x365, not to mention being in the >>>>> office >>>>> most of the time and working from home a LOT too. >>>> >>>> When I was 6 months overseas, I would have loved to be working from my >>>> home. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Are you telling me they don't deserve it? >>>>> >>>>> If you compare it to private industry, then no, they don't. You were >>>>> the >>>>> one that brought up that they got it to be competitive... >>>>> >>>>> Whether they deserve it or not really doesn't matter, they wouldn't be >>>>> getting as many re-ups without it. >>>> >>>> You really don't understand what it is like and have no idea what is >>>> their base pay when you talk about competitive. And you really don't >>>> understand how few guys get this bonus. It is only used in rates that >>>> are >>>> very technical and have long schools. Out of my two year command tour >>>> with >>>> probably 30 re-enlistments, probably 5 or 6 got checks and this is in >>>> an >>>> aviation command. Ships would be less and subs probably more. >>>> >>>> George >>> >>> >> >> > > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.