Jane Kelley wrote in a message to Alex Vasauskas:
AV> There was no scientific research supporting the legislation, Jane.
AV> In fact, the AMA's position that it wanted marijuana to continue to
AV> be available had to be misrepresented to Congress in order for the
AV> original prohibition legislation to pass.  And, of course, the
AV> legislation was not reversed after the AMA denounced this legislative
AV> fraud.
AV> As pointed out by the Merck Manual, the primary objection to
AV> marijuana is POLITICAL -- NOT TOXICOLOGICAL.  Moreover, the DEA's
AV> hearings reviewing ALL of the scientific and medical research, and
 JK>  
 JK>  There has been plenty of scientific research done in both this
 JK> nation and Canada to substantiate shooting anyone who wants to
 JK> legalize that drug!
Considering that the reasearch demonstrates that marijuana has
no toxicological concern, it apparently takes only someone
disagreeing with your unfounded opinions to cause you to want
to kill them. 
 JK>   It has caused the death of several kids in one
 JK> daughter's high school class when combined with alcohol and
 JK> automobiles after midnight.
This demonstrates that irresponsible use and not that the drug
itself caused anything.  As the DEA's hearings regarding
rescheduling marijuana have demonstrated, unlike aspirin, which
kills hundreds a year, and alcohol, which is also toxic, there is
no record of marijuana ever killing anyone.
 JK>   It has made it impossible for others
 JK> to obtain and hold a decent job.
An example of irresponsible use by a few people with prexisting
psychological problems.  In any event, this is irrelevant to
any discussion other than one pointing out that some people
create their own problems.  The fact that someone is
irresponsible or otherwise has a problem does not justify
preventing a vast majority of other adults -- particularly ones
for whom this herb has significant, medicinal benefits, from using
it responsibly.
 JK>  The Merck Manual is not the primary tool of those who deal with
 JK> minds affected by pot or other drugs.  The DSM IV is, and it states
 JK> that marijuna is not at all what you claim it to be but a very
 JK> dangerous and noxious weed.
The Merck Manual is authoritative regarding the effect of drugs,
considering that it is relied upon by even the armed forces as an
authority regarding drugs, I am surprised that it has not been
"politically corrected" to represent the administration's
prohibitionist viewpoint.
To the extent that the DSM IV has value, I have previously cited to you
the pages that discuss marijuana and quoted the language to you that
contradicts your representations and supports what I have been saying.
But, you refuse to read it (or to understand it), and you continue to
repeat your same old discredited line.  This is just another version of
the child who closes her eyes, covers her ears, and shouts "la la la la"
when she wants to ignore anything but what she wants to say or do.  Give
it a rest Jane.
--- 
---------------