> >>   Absolutely.  I think that ball of fire in the sky has more to do with
 > our weather than anything humans can do.

 > > & you'd be 100% right, per my research!

 >   Of course I'm right.  I'm always right.  Its just a curse I have to bear.
 > :)

I hear ya: I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong.

 >    I get a chuckle when people say humans are causing all the problems then
 > try to explain ice ages and warm periods over the eons when humans had
 > nothing to do with it.

Exactly.

 >    And also just what is the perfect weather?  Ice ages?  Warm periods?
 >    I'll watch some show from 30 years ago how the weather changed and it
 > was called weather.  Now its human caused climate change.

Indeed.  Pretty basic -- you & I didn't exercise special genius to figure this
one out.

I assume every anthropgenic climate change screamer is deliberately & knowingly
lying & committing mass fraud, as they HAVE to know better.

The one that out & out peed me off is the ads showing glaciers breaking off
into the ocean & voiceover pointed out how the glaciers are shrinking at an
astronomically fast rate.

WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF??????????????????

I paid attention in school, mostly, but enough to know that as glaciers GROW,
they "calve" pieces into the ocean, which become ice bergs.

Now I'm hearing a polar(NPI) opposite explanation. . . that's worded in such
away, with the visual, that the majority of tv viewers will eat it up,
unquestioningly. & then elect people & effect public policy changes based on
this flawed perception of Earth's reality

This makes me more irate than anty of the other "climate change" lies!

You recall, too, how it was all "global warming" throughout the '80s, unmtil it
was decisively proved the Earth is acrtually cooling (consistent with being in
an ice age event that's within a bigger Ice Age period)

Then. . ."climate change" (highfalutin' word for "weather")

*sigh* Surrounded by morons whose collective vote does nothing to find out
facts. . . just keep electing the liars & cheats who campaign solely on this
web of lies. . . 

It's RUDE, as these stastements from on high are them saying they think I'm a
moron, too, & can't see black & white for what they are (not pink & green)

& if I say anything, I'm the arsehole, & immediately dismissed.

Same as anyone pointing out the obvious flaw in the official story re the
killing of JFK (bullets don't boomerang & hit the target from the other side)

They've spun their crap so well, that immediately, on hearing facvtsm they put
up blocks ("conspiracy nut"); instead of hearing "grassy knoll" as an obvious
error in the official story, they treat it as "conspiracy theory". . .

I'm so thankful I was taught to question everything & look for corroborating
data before coming to any conclusion, whether on my own or fed to me.

I's amazing how they've managed to get the generat8uions sdpo baffled that
there's now about 400 million North Americans (USA & Canada) who,. for the
majoruity, trabidly proclaim the lies they've been spoon-fed.

They eagerly await the dying off of our generation.  Thankfully they don't see
too much need to rush this natural process, as we're such a small minority
we're easily dismissed as old kooks! :( & no danger to upsetting their ill-
gotten applecart.

I must keep trying; my having seen every episode of Star Trek, the Original
Series, compels me. . .

 > > My other take on the situatoin relies more on others' cynicism, as I've
 > > noted the climate change criers are the ones burhning more fossil fuels
 > > than any of the rest of us!

 >   Such as all those private jets going to Glasgow of that recent summit? 

You picked up on that, too, all met by a phalanx of gas-burning stretch
limousines at the airport, to whisk everyone to a 4-star hotel?

I look around for those who picked up on that & it's just you, me, & a couple
professional comics.

 > > & it's funny how all the leaders of the movement have recently spent
 > > 7-figures each buying ocean-front properties (That's like paying thousands
 > > for a sand castle as the tide is coming in)

 >   One would think they would buy property far inland...

Kind of how I figureed it would go if they actually believed the tripe they
spew.  So, hmm. . . what can I conclude by that. Thees people aren't stupid,
just evil.

 >   I find second usage for a lot of stuff.
 >   No particular order: old metal coffee cans for things like rice, sugar,
 > etc.
 >   Old two litre bottles for juices, etc.
 >   Slivers of soap squeezed onto new bars.
 >   Old while cotton socks for cleaning rags.
 >   Cloth rags for cleaning rather than paper towels.
 >   I have a whole lot of things I use over and over.
 >   I was raised on:
 >   Use it up,
 >   Wear it out,
 >   Make it do,
 >   Or do without.

I love it! How should I cite this when I share to my recycling group?

I've got it as:

~# via Joe Mackey on Fido MEMORIES #~
"I was raised on:
'Use it up,
Wear it out,
Make it do,
Or do without.'"

Unless you prefer otherwise?

Your friend,

<+]:{)}
Cyberpope, Bishop of ROM
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux