Hi, Mark-

MH> SCSI was my favorite years ago.  Those drives are the best for random 
MH> seeking of data - which makes them perfect for servers.  I used them in my 

MH> main server many years ago, which used to house the BBS data.

SCSI is quite easy under OS/2 as I'm sure you know.  Windows, not so much.

MH> I'm all SATA these days, except for my DL360 G6 server internal drives 
MH> which are SAS.

I'm running all SATA currently except in the old BBS machine.  I'm thinking
about repurposing it for a syslog server.  The motherboard is a 20+-year-old
SuperMicro setup and it's very very reliable.  I figured if I slap a 120GB
hard drive in it, that should be enough for a syslog server. :)

Now I'm starting to wander off into non-Windows territory (does Windows
support a syslog server?)...

--Sean




--- MBSE BBS v1.0.5.1 (GNU/Linux-i386)