SD> SCSI is quite easy under OS/2 as I'm sure you know. Windows, not so much.

I used to use SCSI with OS/2 Warp 3.0 in the old days.  Even was using
several of the HP DAT tape drives (with auto-loaders) via SCSI back then.

SD> I'm running all SATA currently except in the old BBS machine. I'm
SD> thinking about repurposing it for a syslog server. The motherboard is a
SD> 20+-year-old SuperMicro setup and it's very very reliable. I figured if I
SD> slap a 120GB hard drive in it, that should be enough for a syslog server.
SD> :)
SD> Now I'm starting to wander off into non-Windows territory (does Windows
SD> support a syslog server?)...

Depends on what you are pointing to the syslog server.  One of my work
firewalls set to informational - if pointed to the syslog server was using
5-6GB per day.  

Windows can run syslog servers with no issues.  If I remember correctly, we
are using Kiwi for some syslogs and Solarwinds for others.

- Mark

--- WWIVToss v.1.51