| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: BW vs. QWK |
-=> Quoting Dale Shipp to Sean Dennis on 10 Jul 10 23:09:00 <=- SD> It also comes down to personal taste also. DS> Of course. My reasons for preferring QWK have little to do with the DS> reader itself, but with the other programs I use which operate on QWK DS> packets. I never saw much difference that mattered to me in the way DS> the Bluewave reader handled QWK vs. BW native. That said, I think that DS> the Bluewave reader is far better than anything else I have looked at. I thoroughly agree with your last sentence. As to the rest, I tend to like native BW a little better than QWK, but QWK is far better than not having any packets... and BW does fine with QWK, as far as that goes. DS> Another factor is that my BBS system (Maximus) doesn't have a BW door DS> installed (I suppose one would be available if I wanted to look for DS> it). It is, and apparently had a Y2K fix before Richard came out with his fixes (Juxta has a mostly working BW door). I know that someone was trying to use Richard's fix on a Maximus BW door, but last I heard, he hadn't managed it... it was the latest Maximus BW door, though, and that might have been part of the problem, as that one I understand is different from the ones that the fix works on... ttyl neb ... I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work. --- Blue Wave/DOS v2.20* Origin: The Holodeck BBS Roch, NY telnet://holo.homeip.net (1:261/1381) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848 @PATH: 261/1381 38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.