From: Jeff Shultz 

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:42:58 -0500, Rich Gauszka wrote:

>
> "George Sherwood"  wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.01.28.22.35.12.730041{at}beernabeer.com...
>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:09:50 -0500, Rich Gauszka wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "George Sherwood" 
wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2006.01.28.21.58.20.408609{at}beernabeer.com...
>>>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:43:12 -0500, Robert Comer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>Most that I
>>>>>> signed off on were about $20-25K and usually for a 3 year
>>>>>> enlistment.
>>>>>
>>>>> $25K is a hell of a lot more than I've ever got in a 3
year period
>>>>> out here
>>>>> in private industry...  (I'm an IT Manager.)
>>>>
>>>> And how many 6 months deployments have you made over that 6 month
>>>> period?
>>>> Are you telling me they don't deserve it?
>>>>
>>>> George
>>>
>>> Oh absolutely they deserve it. Sso do those with over 14 years that are
>>> excluded
>>
>> I agree since all my type of incentives have gone way done.
  I never
>> said they weren't used as incentives because they are.  Unfortunately
>> once you have that 14 year mark, the retirement becomes the incentive.
>> I certainly wish it was different.  Most of this stuff is targeted at
>> the 6-12 year folks.  Those that are at the point they need to think
>> about a career in military or somewhere else.
>>
>> George
>
> While the retirement mark becomes the incentive for those over 14 years I
> thought there were quite a few that were screwed out of even that when the
> military last downsized in the 90s.  I also wish it were different

Nope - we got money too.... we didn't get the benny's, but then again, we
volunteered to get out then. Considering I wasn't going to pass my next PT
test and knew that I'd be out at the end of the enlistment, I took it as a
sign from heaven and signed as fast as I could...

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5