BG>> What's more, not being Rockwell code, mine actually worked. Paul
 BG>> Edwards' 33k6 upgrade to his M34F sure doesn't.
 > Although the M34F uses the Motorola 68302 CPU, it also utilises the
 > Rockwell RC288dpi controller chip, which still 
 > contains Rockwell code.

 HM> Well, either way the working Viper and Supras 
 HM> demonstrate that the M34F's 33.6
 HM> problems are not Rockwell (as you said), but rather NetComm's.

Can you elaborate more on these problems?
 
I've had my M34F upgraded and I've had 33.6k or at the very worst 31.2k to
every other 33.6 modem I've called,  except of course Couriers. 
 
With other goodies such as Caller ID and Distinctive Ring the upgrade was
well worth it. 
 
The only thing wrong with Netcomm is asymmetrical connect speeds.  Either
it doesn't support it or it supports it but just doesn't display it.
 
Ludi,
root{at}maxdog.apana.org.au

--- Maximus 3.01