Hi Neil,

 > A copy of the software or of the report?

    Well spotted! I meant the MSDOS executable program. :-)

 > Seriously though, I didn't know that typedef(ing) a
 > reserved word was
 > kosher (at least that's what I think's going on -
 > redefining a pointer
 > to void.  Is this the way you read it, or am I way off
 > base again?

    The syntax error is just caused by the typedef. That version of Cdecl
doesn't know about typedef. Earlier versions did not even know about void.
:-) There are later versions which I don't have. Maybe I'd better get one,
but if I remember right the source uses yacc and lex, and though I do have
MSDOS/Windows versions of both, it seems a lot of trouble to go to for
something I so seldom use.

    Sorry this and the previous took so long to reach you - broken link.

Best Wishes,
Bill.

---