| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM How Good Does a Diagonal Need to Be? |
From: lifedata{at}vol.com
To: atm{at}shore.net
Reply-To: lifedata{at}vol.com
>Clearly the full aperture of a typical diagonal isn't used to form the
>image of a single star, or even two closely placed stars, so, for fine
>detail resolution, one need only consider the error over a portion of
>the diagonal, but it isn't a tiny portion, it is a fairly sizable
>amount like 3/4 or 2/3.
Not to mention the fact that not all telescopy is specifically concerned
with individual stars. The sharpness of planetary telescopy is also a
subject.
Jim L
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.