| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Bush administration to give port control to UAE? |
From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">
Rich Gauszka wrote:
> The neocons are ok with this? Maybe we should outsource the army to Saudi
> Arabia?
>
Humm...The US has comps operating all sorts of important areas for
foriegners. Gee....oil is pretty strategic so may all oil producers should
throw out the Americans & make sure no non national can exploit the
hydrocarbon reserves etc. i.e. if you want to play at global captialism
then.....
If not, pull your companies from the rest of the globe.
Adam
> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/3669663.html
>
> Fear Escalates on Foreign Control of Ports
>
> By TED BRIDIS Associated Press Writer
> C 2006 The Associated Press
>
> WASHINGTON - A New Jersey congressman said Saturday he wants to require that
> security officials at U.S. ports be American citizens to prevent overseas
> companies operating shipping facilities here from hiring foreigners in such
> sensitive positions.
>
> Republican Frank A. LoBiondo, chairman of the Coast Guard and Maritime
> Transportation Subcommittee, cited "significant" security
concerns over a
> $6.8 billion sale that gives a company in the United Arab Emirates control
> over operations at six major American ports.
>
> LoBiondo said he wants the new mandatory citizenship requirements approved
> by Congress and President Bush before state-owned Dubai Ports World
> completes its pending purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam
> Navigation Co.
>
> The British company, the world's fourth-largest ports company, runs major
> commercial operations at shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey,
> Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
>
> The Bush administration earlier approved the deal, which has drawn
> escalating criticism by lawmakers who maintain the United Arab Emirates is
> not consistent in its support of U.S. terrorism-fighting efforts.
>
> Caught by surprise over the breadth of concerns expressed in the United
> States, Dubai Ports World is cautiously organizing its response. The company
> quietly dispatched advisers to reassure port officials along the East Coast,
> and its chief operating officer _ internationally respected American
> shipping executive Edward "Ted" H. Bilkey _ was expected to travel to
> Washington soon for meetings on Capitol Hill and elsewhere.
>
> Meanwhile, the Bush administration is defending its approval of the sale,
> and strongly resisting demands by Congress to reconsider.
>
> State Department spokesman Sean McCormack described the United Arab Emirates
> on Friday as "a long-standing friend and ally" and said the
United States
> and UAE had a good relationship.
>
> Bush visited the port in Tampa, Fla., on Friday but did not mention the
> dispute. Bush said an important element of defeating terrorism was taking
> precautions domestically and working with local officials.
>
> "We've got to protect ourselves by doing smart things in
America," Bush
> said. "I appreciate working with the mayors on homeland security
issues."
>
> In New York, families of some victims from the September 2001 terror attacks
> planned to criticize the deal Sunday during a press conference with Sen.
> Charles Schumer, a leading critic of the sale. Schumer, D-N.Y., said he is
> dubious any assurances can justify the UAE's involvement in American ports.
>
> Schumer and others have cited the UAE's history as an operational and
> financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks against New
> York and Washington.
>
> "A lot of families are incensed by this, because you're talking about the
> safety of the country," said William Doyle, whose son Joseph died at the
> World Trade Center. "We have a problem already in our ports because all of
> our containers aren't checked, but now they want to add this unknown? It's
> not right."
>
> LoBiondo's legislative proposal would amend federal maritime laws to require
> facility security officers, which operate at terminals in every U.S. port,
> to be American citizens. LoBiondo said there now are no citizenship
> requirements, which he said permits foreign companies with a stake in U.S.
> terminal operations to employ security officers who are not Americans.
>
> "We cannot be lax about our nation's security nor fail to
recognize that our
> ports are realistic targets of terrorists," LoBiondo said.
>
>
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.