-=> Quoting Ivy Iverson to Fred Austin <=-
>>> Part 1 of 2...
Hi Ivy,
FA> My only thought
FA> really on this is we as the public are not always aware of new
FA> materials.
II>
II> Quite true, however one would THINK that after over 50 years, we would
II> see similar materials in production in consumer products, nowever this
II> does not seem to be the case.
Depends on the application, it may very well be used in some form
or another.
II> neither bend nor break it. If it were some kind of rubber material, it
II> would have been bendable, I would think, and it certainly wouldn't have
II> the metallic appearance described. Also, it FELT like metal, according
II> to descriptions. Rubber, plastic and similar materials most certainly
II> do NOT look _OR_ FEEL like metal!
I think there is a lot of uncertainly here. Different
descriptions over the years has added bend, couldn't dent it etc. It
is hard to say which is accurate. I have heard dent. But then try and
dent rubber. Or break rubber. Felt like metal I have not heard of.
Metallic look yes. But I do believe that a silvery rubber could very
well be one was talked about.
FA> The foil may have been a rubber with a tin foil type
FA> covering etc, and does unfold etc..
II>
II> I have held, folded and wadded plastic similar to what was described,
II> complete with metallic coating, (thin enough to shine a bright light
II> through), and while it does tend to unfold, it DOES show crease lines
II> when it unfolds. If it were from OUR technology, I would think that
II> they would have started using such a material in consumer products,
II> such as the bags which food is sold in, in a lot less than 50 years!
Now Ivy, I believe there are materials that do exhibit those
properties. As for consumer use, the price of the material is a
determining factor. if the material is space age poly rubber and it
will cost the consumer $5.00 a bag, I do not think there will be a
market for it. Simple math. As the price comes down on manufacturing
techniques, then it becomes a viable product for the general masses.
In the 1950's there were computers. Were they on the market. No.
Unless you wanted to spend $10,000,000. Look at satellite dishes.
They have been around for what 30 years. Only in the last 5-10 years
have they really been available to the public as something affordable.
II> This doesn't surprise me! If a light airplane, such as a Cessna 150
II> were to crash, it would be a simple matter to pick up pieces and throw
II> them into the trunk of a car. Remember, most of it was loaded onto a
II> truck, covered with a tarp, and trucked to an AAF, (now USAF), base to
II> be flown to... wherever. And it was under armed guard all the way! It
II> was only small pieces of the wreckage, like you would find in the
II> vicinity of a small plane crash, that went into the car's trunk.
That is speculation. That is not the original story. Somewhere
along the way we have added trucks with tarps etc.. This story has
become so exaggerated that I believe it could never be resolved.
Second we are not talking a Cessna here, we would be talking about a
possible interstellar craft or even short range craft. I think it
would be a little bit bigger than portrayed. It was flown to Wright
Patterson. Under guard yes,because if it was secret it would be
guarded regardless of what it was. Also according to testimonies from
I believe it was guards themselves,I would have to look it up, the
stuff flown was in a "couple" of boxes. Not very large. I think you
have been listening to a lot of hearsay...
II> air...INSTANTLY! Family members of witnesses were told in so many words
II> that if they ever breathed a word about what they "knew"... "The desert
II> is a big place, and nobody will ever find your bones..." That sounds
II> to me like Uncle Sam was pretty darn worried about SOMETHING!
First then, why are they alive and talking now or 20 years ago.
Why were they allowed to live. Given the potential of the secret.
They are expendable. They whole town would be expendable. Right next
to a nuclear base. How unfortunate. Accidental detonation. No
survivors, no witnesses. Also if this were so true, there is no time
limit on talking. If were are to believe that they were threatened in
such a manner. You cannot have conspiracy that follows no rules or at
least does not backup its own threats.
Ok, I am going to make one point about Roswell,the one everyone seems
to ignore. I have said this before. Ask yourself the one serious
question. Given the history of the world the last 40 years, the way
countries are, do you honestly believe, your country could hide a
captured UFO from the intelligence agencies of the rest of the world
forever. With the Soviets breathing down your neck, living on the
edge of Armageddon, would not advanced technology be the key to
starting WW3. As history has shown, the world lived on edge for many
years, in detente. Which meant, each side had a equal amount of
firepower. Alien technology would have tipped the balance. Both
sides the U.S and Soviets have been spying on each other for years.
Do you seriously believe that the Soviets were not in your country
investigating Roswell. Each side knows what the other side has.
Period. Your country may very well be able to hide data from
Ufologists with limited resources, but not from a nation with
unlimited resources. Case in point, where do you think the photos of
illustrious Area 51 are coming from. Soviet satellites. So, now re-
evaluate Roswell. It just doesn't fit past history...... Everyone
neatly leaves the rest of the world out in the cold, when in fact, the
rest of the world would be seriously interested........
Happy Trails,
Fred.
Internet: Fred.Austin@juxta.mn.pubnix.net
Fred.Austin@sphinx.hughestech.com
--- Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
---------------
* Origin: Juxtaposition BBS. Lasalle, Quebec, Canada (1:167/133)
|