On 17 Mar 2005 13:18:18 -0800, "Hyerdahl"  wrote:

>
>Viking wrote:
>> On 17 Mar 2005 08:09:46 -0800, "Hyerdahl"
 wrote:
>>
>> >There has always been, in UK law, the concept of implied contract.
>>
>> So precedent makes it right? Females shouldn't have the vote then, is
>> that what you're saying?
>
>Precedent is just precedent

If so, why mention it? Why not say there have always been stop signs?
No, obviously you thought it carried weight. Until I pointed out that
females shouldn't have the vote then.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/19/05 12:59:09 AM ---