On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:54:11 -0800, RobertVB  wrote:

>In article ,
> wrote:
>
>> Moose, MOOSE! How  many times must I direct your attention to the fact
>> that YOU have already posted the laws that I refer to. You know what
>> they are and what they say. I pointed that out to you when you posted
>> them . Stop doing the stupid act (to the extent that you can.)
>
>Lets see - this is the ONLY part of the bill C-28 that even mentions
>same gender marriages:
>
>------------
> 4. For greater certainty, a marriage is not void or voidable by reason
>only that the spouses are of the same sex.
>----------
>Other than that it is giving equal treatment to all Canadian citizens
>regardless of the gender of their cosignee.
>
>Proven deceptive once again.  I asked before, you aren't Christians
>(since they don't lie, tell half-truths, gossip) you haven't shown any
>reason why some citizens should be treated differently than others, and
>given no justification for restricting the civil contract's licensing
>to opposite gender couples other than cultural inertia, that if allowed
>would change the status quo less than 1%.
>
>What *is* your motivation in this?

To demonstrate how fucking stupid people like you are. Thank you for
your total cooperation. You have made my task so easy.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/19/05 12:59:09 AM ---