In article  , USA
  wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:43:58 -0500, "Deborah Terreson"
>  wrote:
>
>>In article  , "Society"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "USA"  wrote in message
>>> news:cbrh31hjmi528dq56ldhfk53s3gh7pt0rh{at}4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> Freeze! I just had my nails done!
>>>> by Ann Coulter, WorldNetDaily (3/16/05)
>>>>
>>>> How many people have to die before the
>>>> country stops humoring feminists?
>>>
>>> Lessee, in the USA alone the death toll from
>>> feminists has exceeded 45 million individual
>>> human beings and that's from just ONE of
>>> the feminist agenda's projects.
>>
>>So what?
>>
>>That's 45 million people that not even their mothers wanted, shuffled off to
>>meet God.
>
> Such a statement invariably brings out the Nazi's as a comprable
> example of what you are advocating.  It's been done ad nauseum but the
> example does fit here.

Then let's take the unwanted little rats and house and feed them and create
a Nazi youth like organization. All the kids that would have otherwise been
aborted can see the State as their benefactors and actually become the
brownshirts of the New AmeriKKKa! Hey, I like that. We can creat a whole
second-class caste of 'brownshirt' police who serve the state - sure we can
make the warehouse orphanages very tough and brutal, but that's okay - just
weeds out the weak ones, and leaves the survivors very vicious and strong.
>>
>>Better to be dead and in His Loving Embrace than live in the hell of neglect
>>and abuse.
>
> Have you ever been dead?  If not, how do you know what is "better?"

No , I did try to escape the hell and abuse I got shoved into, but who'd
have thought that a 70+ foot drop off of a cliff onto rocks at the Glen
Boulder, wouldn't kill a person. Only time in my entire life I was at peace
was when I stepped into the void, off the edge and let go. Instead I got the
message Loud and Clear, that the life was my punishment, and I wasn't
getting out of it.

Death IS better when the option is self immolation in drugs, avariciousness,
crime, despair or just not caring anymore.

>>
>>What costs more, an abortion or paying welfare for 18 years and the
>>increased costs to the social system when these little unwanted rats grow up
>>into wild animals that rape, rob and kill? Are jails more cost effective?
>
> Here's a novel approach:  Expect women to take care of their children
> in much the way we legally expect fathers to do.  When women don't do
> it, remove the children from these irresponsible mothers along with
> the source of free money these children invariably bring to their
> mothers.

And do what with them? House them in foster care which isn't free either?

Do you think that the state doesn't pay foster families to support unwanted
kids? Get real, my friend. Knew a guy that put HIS biological kids through
school with the money he got 'keeping' foster children on his farm. none of
them went to college, BTW.

Still costs more than an abortion.

>>
>>Anyhow, isn't welfare part of that value system you revile because it is
>>supported by Other People's Money?
>>
>>Oh, but I forgot, you want it both ways, like most women do.
>
> Society is a woman?

He can be VERY feminine when it suits his arguments.

> I thought wrong then.

No, you have it correct. He is a man. Sometimes just a really indecisive one
on what he wants, though. This is old between us however, so it's No Big..
>>
>>Not me. I say let the little bastards be chopped out of their mothers'
>>unloving wombs. It's cheaper in the long run.
>
> Below you complain about money being all that matters to Americans.
> Here you advocate doing something based solely on money -- that is,
> what is "cheaper."  Looks like maybe you are projecting your obsession
> with money onto everyone else.

If money isn't a Big Issue, why the falderall with Social Security, and
Medicare and the National Debt?

Money is ALL this society cares about.

Or have you missed the fact that the government is gutting the social safety
net to pay for the tax breaks to the billionaires and their business (money)
interests. If protecting EVERY child in America was a sacrosanct priority,
there'd be funds available and people would gladly sacrifice a little bit of
their material wealth for the common good. But that's not happening, is it?

Look this country LOST it's moral foil when the Soviet Union had the
screaming bad taste to collapse. At that point, capitalism became the tool
and proof of our supremacy, and for this we lost our national soul to the
Almighty Dollar and the bottom line.

50 some years ago, Kruschev pounded his shoe on a podium at the U.N, and
said the communists would bury us, that we were so decadent that we'd sell
them the rope they hang us with. Okay, maybe not the Russians, but they're
not the only communists in the world, are they? To this day there are people
that don't recognize that China is still planning on driving us into the
dirt and we've gotten so damn cocksure of our superiority that we fail to
see the danger. It's not like China isn't using capitalism - our tool! - to
further it's agenda of communism on a global scale.

We don't see it, because we can no longer see anything but capitalism, and
it colors all thought and philosophy in this nation and of course, it's not
something that will EVER be used against us. Oh no, not *that* rope.

>>Remember, money is all that matters in America.
>
> Money is undeniably important in America.  But it is not "all that
> matters."  Your view of America is not necessarily the same as
> reality.

I'll place a bet that right here and now, in March of 2005, it's more true
than most want to admit.

Deb.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 8:59:07 PM ---