In article ,
 S.Taylor  wrote:

> Clause #1:
> At any time the employer can dismiss the employee without cause. The
> employee will forfeit all assets to the employeer, including pensions,
> cash-in-bank, or stocks/bonds. The employee will vacate his residence
> and immediately transfer title to the employer.
>
> Nobody would sign such a document, right?
>
> Wrong!
>
> Change employer to wife. Change employee to husband. This is exactly
> what the law governing marriage will do to a man. He is entering into a
> contract that is so one-sided that he is essentially a slave.
>
> That men continue to sign it demonstrates how manipulative feminists
> are.

Good question.

Note that we live in a country where the S.C. can make up
whatever the "constitution" says and deprive us of rights
and liberties that way too.

The man takes the risk because the potential benefits,
for him, outweigh the risks.  Also, a lot of men
are brainwashed into not looking at the fine print
because such women don't take to such men in the first
place.

regards,
Mark Sobolewski


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/19/05 8:59:02 PM ---