USA wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2005 07:24:28 -0800, "Hyerdahl"
 wrote:
>
> USA wrote:
>
> > It's much too late in the game for them to ask that women be viewed
as
> >different from men now because it suddenly gives women an advantage.
>
> Pregnancy and childbirth are exactly what I'm talking about as things
> that feminists want special advantages for while yammering for years
> that men and women are THE SAME.  Nice to see you agree with me for a
> change.  ;-)
>
> HyerParg wrote:
>
> >Where women are similarly situated (what you might call "the
same",
> >they MUST be equally treated;  where women are dissimilarly
situated,
> >they may be treated differently to make sure they get equal rights.
> >The law on this topic clearly prove that you don't get to determine
how
> >women are "viewed".  It's already spelled out.
>
> You can't treat anyone "differently" so that they are
"equal."  'Doh!
>
> USA wrote:
>
> > Nobody gets it both ways.  Not even feminists.

Correction...only feminists get it both ways because they are women and
they have more political power than men.  It's a fact that is now
recorded in the historical record for generations to view with the
encouragement of the masculist rulers of the future.

> HyerParg wrote:
>
> >The concept of similar vs. dissimilar situation is already
established,
> >dear.  Your dick isn't some magic wand as much as you wish it were.
You
> >can't change the the law.
>
> The concept is firmly established in foolish feminists' minds but
they
> aren't fooling anyone else anymore.

The feminists spent the first fifty years of the 20th century getting
control of the social sciences and the last fifty years using that
power to suppress non feminist theories and research while
propogandizing their feminism.  The social sciences are now a joke and
people are flocking to churches for any semblance of truth.  All this
was done to make sexual equality palatable to the courts.

Now the feminists want to claim that sexual equality is a done legal
deal and then "construct" a new rationale for feminism that bypasses
sexual equality.  The selfishness, manipulation and cruelty of feminism
should forever be taught to future generations.  A kind of reminder and
update to Adam and Eve.

> As for my dick not being "some magic wand" --  indeed not.  I don't
> have a dick.  Neither do you.  The difference is I don't wish I had
> one while your penis envy is noted in everything you post.

She wants to be a man so bad yet is so obviously a woman that you can't
help but feel sorry for her.  Poor girl, if she were a dyke it wouldn't
be so bad for her.

> As for me being unable to change the law  -- nonsense.  Many laws
have
> been changed throughout HIStory and many times the change was
> instigated by just one individual.

In the early Nineties a workmate commented on my anti-feminism and
organization "AUM" saying that I didn't have a chance against the huge
feminist organization and advocacy.  I said men don't need all that,
one guy and organization could easily beat all the feminist
organizations in the world.

Tom

> Dustbin wrote:
>
> >> Where 'ave you been the last thirty years?
>
> HyerParg wrote:
>
> >Apparently, right here with my law journals.  :-)
>
> Translation:  You've been living under a rock with your comic books.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/19/05 8:59:02 PM ---