From: Bill Lucy 

In article , bobcomer-
removeme-{at}mindspring.com says...
>
> Let me restate that just a tad, it's true E=MC2 describes the
> conversion of mass to energy, it doesn't describe a nuclear explosion
> any more than any other mass to energy conversion vector, and in
> that's what I mean be it doesn't have anything to do with Nukes.

What other mass to energy conversion vector is there besides ke=1/2mv^2
(from which e=mc^2 is derived)? Are you therefore saying that
"normal" explosions have nothing to do with *that* formula? I
would have even
*more* of a problem with that.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5