From: "Robibnikoff" 


"Rev. Karl E. Taylor"  wrote in
message news:0goid4-6ro2.ln1{at}dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com...
> Robert wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:58:38 -0400, raven1
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:43:30 -0800, Robert 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:07:08 GMT, "Smiler"

>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Not entirely correct. ( Apart from some bloody
minded fanatics who
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> wrong)
>>>>>> The Church teaches that the use of condoms as a means of
>>>>>> contraception is
>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>> The church also teaches that in matters of
morality everyone must
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> and foremost obey his or her conscience.
>>>>> But in the eyes of the RCC, condom use is still wrong.
>>>>  Correct, because sex as entertainment is wrong. Sex is for
>>>> conception. The only moral and effective means of avoiding
a unwanted
>>>> pregnancy is abstinence, which also avoids STDS. STDS and unwanted
>>>> pregnancies are Gods punishment for having sex, to entertain your
>>>> self. Sex is always wrong unless a husband wants his wife to have a
>>>> child.
>>> Must suck to be your wife.
>>
>> One of the reasons that I reject religion, is this kind of stupidity.
>> Use it or lose it, I am 68 years old, my wife is 66 we still delight
>> in the pleasure of having sex, often.
>>
> I never can get the fundies to actually address this issue.  I'm 46, my
> wife is 44 and 9 years ago she scared the crap out of us when she was
> diagnosed with possible ovarian cancer.  Everything was removed and
> fortunately she did not have cancer.  However, child birth also became
> impossible as well.
>
> Does that mean we are no longer allowed to enjoy a healthy sex life,
> just because we can't have kids now?
>
> Watch the fundies run.

Hmmm, I got my tubes tied almost 7 years ago. Should I not be having sex
either?  Oh my.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag