From: George Sherwood 

Ad wrote:
> George Sherwood wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:27:24 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
>>
>>>> So why do you leave this part out?  Sex scandals are generally very
>>>> non-partisan.
>>> I leftthis part out, too - your point being?
>>
>> My point being very simple.  You comment making this approaching
>> scandal to be only a hit on the administration is not going to be true
>> and the amount of help is provides to Hillary is not going to be that
>> much.  I don't think she will be wanting to be getting on a soapbox
>> about sex scandals.  You aren't going to see that.
>>
>> George
>
> Is she the only Democrat running for President?
>
> Unleash the deniable attack dogs as per Republican SOP (e.g. the slurs
> heaped on McCain in 2000).

I am not the one claiming that this was going to help Hillary.  I said
nothing, but that I didn't think it would help her due to other issues.
 You added any other thoughts.

And how unleashed any attack dogs here other then Phil?

George

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5