From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

George Sherwood wrote:
> Ad wrote:
>> George Sherwood wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:27:24 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So why do you leave this part out?  Sex scandals are
generally very
>>>>> non-partisan.
>>>> I leftthis part out, too - your point being?
>>> My point being very simple.  You comment making this approaching
>>> scandal to be only a hit on the administration is not going to be true
>>> and the amount of help is provides to Hillary is not going to be that
>>> much.  I don't think she will be wanting to be getting on a soapbox
>>> about sex scandals.  You aren't going to see that.
>>>
>>> George
>> Is she the only Democrat running for President?
>>
>> Unleash the deniable attack dogs as per Republican SOP (e.g. the slurs
>> heaped on McCain in 2000).
>
> I am not the one claiming that this was going to help Hillary.  I said
> nothing, but that I didn't think it would help her due to other issues.
>  You added any other thoughts.
>
> And how unleashed any attack dogs here other then Phil?
>
> George

18 months to go. Keep the powder dry but stockpile it is the order of the day.

These sort of things will be brought out later to the date.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5