From: Bill Lucy 

In article <39294aa9{at}w3.nls.net>, richhong{at}hawksci.com says...

> Why?  This makes little sense to me, as the legal responsibility of raising
> a child falls to the natural parents, not the married parents.  I think this
> becomes clearer when you consider the case of a child whose mother is
> married, but was impregnated by someone other than her husband.  The
> custodial rights remain with the natural parents as listed on the birth
> certificate, and the woman's husband basically has no rights.

As a step-father, I would amend that last to "few rights".

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5