| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Lost messages |
-> On 11 Jun 09 01:20:08, Bob Ackley got back to Dan Ceppa -> Re: Lost messages DC> Scalia stated that torture is not unconstitutional, plain and simple. BA> He did not say that it was not unethical, not immoral and not illegal. BA> In point of fact I think he did say that torture was illegal. Do notice that he also says, "defining [torture] is going to be a nice trick." BA> The Constitution specifies "cruel and unusual *punishment*" (emphasis BA> mine), Scalia pointed out that (legally) torture is not punishment and BA> because it is not (legally) *punishment* it is not unConstitutional. BA> Legal hairsplitting, perhaps, but that's what lawyers *do*. Scalia states that many other things that are odious are not listed in the Constitution. Does that make things such as pedophilia legal? I would like to see Scallia rule on a pedophilia case and then have a ruling on torture. All he's doing is trying to set up a defense for W and company. --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 11/331 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 187 140/1 226/0 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 396/45 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 5030/1256 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.