~> ~>  That one has Neilsen's testimony, not just a description by
~> ~>  someone else, and it is identical.
~> 
~> But now you know that what was done to him was not even CLOSE to
~> "identical."  He was FORCED to ingest water to the point
that he passed
~> out.  He WAS drowning.  Then he was revived by being jumped on to push the
~> water out.

You still have given no indication that you understand the difference
between a person ingesting no water and a person ingesting so much water
that they pass out and get revived by being JUMPED ON.  It is not
"identical."

~> ~>  EC> What he did describe was his REACTION to what
~> ~>  EC> the Japanese did: he felt like he was drowning.  Gee whiz,
~> ~>  EC> Bob, WHY did he feel that way?  It is because he WAS
~> ~>  EC> DROWNING.  You have been educated several times on what the
~> ~>  EC> Japanese "water cure" involved, and either it
hasn't stuck
~> ~>  EC> in your head or you are ignoring what you know in order to
~> ~>  EC> cover your lies with a plea of ignorance.

Does your immune system identify facts as alien invaders and then attack them?

~> Well, let's review what you were discussing: "You missed the fact that the
~> method often used is described in terms identical to the methods used by US
~> interrogators. And Japanese military were tried for war crimes for that."
 
~> And yet you cannot name them.

Still cannot.  Not even an attempt.

~> And more from you: "During WW2 both forms  were used by the Japanese, and
~> Japanese military personell, and some civilians, were prosecuted for using
~> the same method the US interrogators."
 
~> And yet you cannot name them.  Not only can you not show who was CONVICTED
~> for war crimes for using "the same method" that the US used on three
~> terrorists six years ago, but you cannot even show that ANY Japanese
~> interrogator EVER used "the same method" during World War II.

Still nothing but diversions and bluster from you.
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a