1237a07e6bc3
bluewave



Hello Jean - 

JP>> I have come to the conclusion that BWRepfx.exe can only
JP>> deal with one fix. 

CA>> I mentioned this problem long long ago and just recently.
CA>> Each time I do there is a feeding frenzy with my corpse as
CA>> the main course. BW zealots insist it is THE solution to
CA>> the Y2K issues and I quit using BW because of it (the
CA>> patch). 

JP> It has to be something else, I now think, as yesterday, I
JP> went over the .rep in \bluewa~1\work\reply\xxx.yyy maybe 4
JP> times and the data was not damaged. Where is this random
JP> gremlin ? 

I had been using BW for quite some time when Y2K rolled around.
After installing 'the patch' I began having problems and I
_think_ the patch was modified. I installed the new patch and
continued having problems. 

When I tried to discuss these problems BW users went ballistic.
I guess the fantasy that everything was "OK" was too important
to allow a little thing like "It doesn't always work" to get in
the way? 

I had worked out the sequence that was causing the problems but
no one wanted to accept reality and it's been so long ago now
that I really don't remember much about BW and it's patch
files. :-\ 

>
>        ,                                        ,
>      o/      Charles_Angelich  - DOS Ghost       \o       ,
>       __o/
>     / >  www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/  < \   __\__
 

___ * ATP/16bit 2.31 * 
... DOS the Ghost in the Machine! http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/

--- Maximus/2 3.01