-> On 24 Jun 09  07:06:26, Earl Croasmun got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: Screw anyone possibly innocent!

 ~>  ~> Too bad the evidence exonerates them, isn't it.  
 
 ~>  EC> You apparently don't know any more about the case than he did.  There
 ~>  EC> was ample evidence against Osbourne.  He was convicted.  One
small part
 ~>  EC> of that evidence against him was a low-grade DNA test.  The defense
 
 ~> If that evidence proves he was not the ione involved, he should walk.  

 EC> opportunity to get a better test that would get down to the range of
 EC> 99.99% exclusion rather than 84%, but intentionally chose not to based
 EC> on the belief that it would ALSO be positive and thus seal his
 EC> conviction. 

Was he convicted on some of the crimes?  

If so, what's the problem?  

--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30