From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:31:03 -0500, Robert G Lewis
 wrote:

>
> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
> news:op.s5su8od6eipai0{at}dsl40.bgtnvtpl.sover.net...
>> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:55:29 -0500, Robert G Lewis
>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>>> news:op.s5sdqqe0eipai0{at}dsl40.bgtnvtpl.sover.net...
>>>> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 06:33:10 -0500, Phil Payne
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4765058.stm
>>>>>
>>>>> Video showing President George W Bush being warned on the eve of
>>>>> Hurricane
>>>>> Katrina that the storm could breach New Orleans' flood
defences has
>>>>> emerged.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure and how many times was he warned the same about other
storms and
>>>> how
>>>> many other "experts" contradicted what he is
shown being told and is
>>>> there
>>>> footage of that?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gary Wiltshire
>>>
>>> Why does that matter ?
>>>
>>> Bush did state
>>>
>>> "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees."
>>>
>>> does not appear to have been a true statement and he seems to have been
>>> directly told before he made the statement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The point I'm making is that in any situation a president can be told
>> one
>> thing by 99 out of 100 experts and the 1 out of 100 who happened to be
>> right, even if only that one time, is portrayed as a prophet.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary Wiltshire
>
> I understand that. I was only commenting on Bush making a statement that
> he
> should have known was untrue.
>
> Bob Lewis
>
>

Not if what he is shown being told was contradicted by his other
"experts."  In addition I find it curious that people who were
riding Brown are suddenly willing to lend him so much credence -- must be
the opportunity to bash Bush.

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5