> ->  > The original reply from Richard seemed to have cut the
text off at the
 > end o
 > ->  > the lines. Maybe what was cut off was actually saved in
RAW format, bu
 > cut
 > ->  > off to fit in the 80 or less characters per line? If this
is the case,
 > it's
 > ->  > probably one of Synchronet's external editors (can't really blame
 > ->  > Synchronet, as there is no "default editor" for it).
 > ->  >
 > ->  > Anyways, I know I'm more or less continuing the beating
of a dead hors
 > ->  > here, but figured I'd mention what I noticed.
 > ->  >
 > 
 > -> There are plenty of editors that function in a manner not all like.
 > 
 > Recently with the newer java script editors for synchronet, I find this
 > happens all the time. One of the authors tried to fix it for me, to his
 > credit. He fixed the chainsaw problem, but it then started to pull words
 > together, when used as a quote in a reply. Kinda like this.
 > together, whenused as a quotein a reply. Kindalike this.

Hehe i've avoided that one at least.


 > And You are right Carol. Things are getting a bit sloppy out there with
 > the editors. You as well as I may remember this, it must be something
 > that is tough to work with and may cause problems. Remember when Tim
 > Strike fixed this in Telegard? There was actually an option in system
 > setup where You could choose to have the regular quote or the one that
 > fixed the chainsaw effect. Not being a programmer, I don't know what it
 > involves, but it may be difficult to fix or they just don't understand
 > what some are talking about when it is reported.

Basically there are no 'unslopppy' quoters that work with every variation out
there and that's simply how it is. Tim fixed the See-saw at the expence of
characters truncating. Now what you see is folks complaining they cant quote
you right so 'must be you'.  

Whatever, we will use what we have to communicate.

  xxcarol


--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32